.

Factbook

Mapping environmental conflicts and cooperation

Factbook

0
Comments

Oyu Tolgoi Mining Conflict in Mongolia

Type of conflict main
Intensity 1
Region
Eastern Asia
Time 2013 ‐ 2015
Countries Mongolia
Resources Agricultural / Pastoral Land, Water
Conflict Summary The Gobi region has limited surface water resources and low annual rainfall. Oyu Tolgoi is one of the world’s largest undeveloped copper-gold deposits...
Oyu Tolgoi Mining Conflict in Mongolia
The Gobi region has limited surface water resources and low annual rainfall. Oyu Tolgoi is one of the world’s largest undeveloped copper-gold deposits located in the South Gobi region, Mongolia, and the project is managed by Oyu Tolgoi LLC, which is majority-owned by Rio Tinto, a multinational mining corporation. In 2013, a group of local herders filed a complaint against Oyu Tolgoi LLC to the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO), which was concerned about a river diversion that could lead to several water systems drying up, deteriorated pastureland yields, and a threat to traditional livelihoods. The CAO found it eligible for further assessment of the complaint in 2013. After a series of CAO facilitated meetings between the herders and the company from 2013 to 2015 they were able to agree upon and implement specific actions to assess issues related to the complaint. Furthermore, the CAO mediation process resulted in a tripartite committee consisting of representatives of local government, elected herders (the complainants) and the company in 2015.
Conceptual Model

Intermediary Mechanisms

The mine is located in the area surrounded by nomadic herders whose livelihoods are heavily dependent on pastureland and water. Local communities are concerned that the mine could lead to several water systems drying up, deteriorate pastureland, and threaten traditional livelihoods.

Fragility and Conflict Risks

When the construction of the mine intensified, the issue of water access and security caused disputes between the mine, local communities and NGOs. Local herders were mobilized to raise their concern over the water and other impacts of the project.

Climate ChangeEnvironmental ChangeIntermediary MechanismsFragility and Conflict RisksSocial and Economic DriversEconomic developments place additional strains on water resources.Economic activity causes pollution.Water scarcity undermines water-dependent livelihoods.Land scarcity undermines the livelihoods of agricultural producers.Pollution reduces available/usable land.Livelihood insecurity fuels grievances between groups.Livelihood insecurity leads to growing discontent with the state.A broad concept to cover economic growth in general but also specific economic changes or changes of incentives.Economic DevelopmentAn increase in the scarcity of clean water and/or an increased variability in water supply.Increased Water ScarcityPollution and degradation of ecosystems, such as coral reefs.Pollution / Environmental DegradationA threat or destruction of livelihoods dependent on the availability of environmental resources / goods.Livelihood InsecurityReduced availability of/ access to land.Increased Land ScarcityNon-violent or violent tensions and conflicts between different societal groups.Grievances between Societal GroupsChallenge to the state's legitimacy, ranging from peaceful protest to violent attempts at overthrowing the government.Anti-State Grievances
Context Factors
  • Water-stressed Area
Conflict History

Oyu Tolgoi is one of the world’s largest undeveloped copper-gold deposits, located 80 kilometres north of the Chinese border in Khanbogd soum, South Gobi province, Mongolia. After several years of negotiation, Ivanhoe Mines, a Canadian mineral exploration and development company, and Rio Tinto, a British-Australian multinational mining and metals corporation, signed a 30-year investment agreement with the Mongolian Government to develop the Oyu Tolgoi project in 2009.

Context of the project
The project is funded by a group of international lenders, including International Financial Corporation (IFC) and Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), the private sector lending and insurance arms of the World Bank Group. The mine is located in the area surrounded by nomadic herders whose livelihoods are heavily dependent on pastureland and water. The Gobi region has limited surface water resources, low annual rainfall and is also prone to drought, wind and dust storms.

Social and environmental impacts of the project
Due to its large-scale land requirements and construction phase developments, the Oyu Tolgoi project was required to manage a range of social and environmental impacts: resettlement (10 households) and economic displacement of herder households (approximately 90), division of pastures, river diversion, impeded access to wells, and overall reduction of pastureland in the region (IFC, 2014). When the construction of the mine intensified, the issue of water access and security became the centre of the dispute between the mine, local communities and NGOs. Local herders were mobilized to raise their concern over the water and other impacts of the project.

The response of NGOs: Gobi Soil and Oyu Tolgoi Watch
In February 2013, Gobi Soil, a Khanbogd-based NGO representing a group of local herders, assisted by Oyu Tolgoi Watch NGO, filed a complaint against Oyu Tolgoi LLC to the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO), a mechanism for communities to voice concerns if they believe they are adversely affected by IFC and MIGA supported projects. Their complaint was about the Undai River, a seasonal river that runs through the lease, that was diverted to avoid its flooding into the mine’s open-pit. They were concerned that the Undai river diversion would cause several water systems to dry up, deteriorated pastureland yields, and negative impacts on traditional livelihoods (CAO, 2013). 

Resolution Efforts

Oyu Tolgoi LLC´s approach
Oyu Tolgoi LLC prepared an integrated Environmental and Social Impact assessment (ESIA) that drew together all previous studies plus any additional work needed to fill gaps with the IFC Performance Standards and disclosed it in both English and Mongolian in August 2012. The company invited feedback on the ESIA from all stakeholders, including members of the public (BIC, 2012).

The CAO mediation process
The CAO found the Khanbogd-based NGO’s complaint in 2013 eligible for further assessment, and it conducted an assessment during which the parties agreed to work within CAO's Dispute Resolution function in an attempt to resolve the concerns raised in the complaint using collaborative methods (CAO, 2013). The complainants stated that local community consent and approval was required for the Undai River diversion, whereas OT contended they had all the legal permissions and rights to proceed with construction to divert the river inside the mine license area. The complainants’ formal position was that all construction work related to the diversion of the river should be stopped until community consent could be obtained, while OT insisted the work must continue in order to protect the river for the community and prevent water from ending up in the mine (CAO, 2013).

A series of meetings between the complainants and the responsible company personnel were facilitated by CAO appointed mediators in Khanbogd since 2013. The whole negotiation process required significant commitment, time and resources from both parties. The CAO mediators played an important role to maintain the collaborative process effectively. As a result, the parties were able to agree upon specific actions such as re-construction of a spring that was dried up due to the river diversion based on community consultation, water monitoring methods, and providing water in tanks to herders affected by the river diversion (CAO, 2015).

The emergence of a local mechanism
The two-partite CAO mediation process eventually attracted the attention of local authorities. A Tripartite Committee that involves representatives of local government, elected herders (the complainants) and the company was established in 2015. The Memorandum of Understanding on the establishment of the committee and the bylaw of it were collaboratively written by the parties to ensure that the initial complaints are adequately addressed and the parties maintain a broad dialogue in the future (CAO, 2015).

Intensities & Influences
conflict intensity scale
Intensities
International / Geopolitical Intensity
Human Suffering

Influences
Environmental Influences
Societal Influences

Fatalities
0
Violent Conflict No
Salience within nation Municipal
Mass Displacement None
Cross Border Mass Displacement No
Resources
Agricultural / Pastoral Land, Water
Resolution Success
Reduction in geographical scope There has been no reduction in geographical scope.
Increased capacity to address grievance in the future The capacity to address grievances in the future has increased.
Grievance Resolution Grievances have been completely taken into account.
Causal Attribution of Decrease in Conflict Intensity Conflict resolution strategies have been clearly responsible for the decrease in conflict intensity.
General opencollapse
Country Data in Comparison
ConflictNoData Created with Sketch.
Fault Lines Defining Conflict Parties
Purely Environmental | Cultural   ♦   Occupational   ♦   Economic   ♦   Urban / Rural   ♦   National / International conflict   ♦   Sub-national political


Actors
Participation Conflict Party     Conflict Resolution Facilitator
Oyu Tolgoi LLC
Functional GroupPublic
Geographical ScaleInternal National
Local herders
Functional GroupPublic
Geographical ScaleInternal Grassroots
Gobi Soil
Functional GroupPublic
Geographical ScaleInternal Grassroots
Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO)
Functional GroupPublic
Geographical ScaleExternal
Local authorities
Functional GroupPublic
Geographical ScaleInternal Grassroots
Entry Points for Resilience and Peace Building
3 Mediation & arbitration A group of local herders, assisted by the NGO Oyu Tolgoi Watch, filed a complaint against Oyu Tolgoi LLC to the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO). The CAO mediation process resulted in a tripartite committee consisting of representatives of local government, elected herders, and the company in 2015.
Further Details opencollapse
Conflict Characterization
Character of the contested good Common-pool resource: No one can be excluded from use but the good is depleted.
Structure of decision-making power / interdependence Asymmetric: The power to affect the environmental resource is unequal.
Broad conflict characterization Resource capture is not present.
Ecological marginalization is not present.
Data of involved Countries
Resources and Materials opencollapse
×